Over 102978

Extremis Demotivational Poster

Keep Looking Up -

Vows -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 4.96/5

More motifakes by Ism

falloutghoul - November 21, 2013, 8:00 am
Good, 'cause we're on short supply.


TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 3.25/5

More motifakes by WTFO

Regression&Division - December 13, 2009, 10:48 am
WTFO -- You are an amazingly, awesomely, absolutely mind-blowingly kickass person. God bless you, sir. God bless you. Say it with me now, gents... AMERICA -- FUCK YEAH!
WTFO - June 13, 2009, 12:29 am
loss of human life that directly resulted from them getting their way. So, I respectfully disagree with your assessment of Vietnam.
WTFO - June 13, 2009, 12:29 am
protecting that many people is worth risking my life. What is remarkable about that time in history is those who protested the war, lied about our troops conduct over there, and subverted our efforts and morale, turned their backs and ignored the huge
WTFO - June 13, 2009, 12:27 am
To be fair, I wasn't there to see those we were defending running away, but with a communist force backed by China who can blame them. What I do know is that around 2.5M people were slaughtered by the communists in N Vietnam and Cambodia. As a serviceman
A Conservative - June 12, 2009, 5:09 pm
person I'm willing to lay my life down for, much less any MORE of our troops lives.
A Conservative - June 12, 2009, 5:09 pm
Just wanted to add something about what WTFO said. Pulling the troops from Vietnam was, IMO a good choice. Our allies, as you put it, who we "abandoned," were always running away from the combat that we were running toward. Not exactly the kind of
moooooooooooooooooooo - May 9, 2009, 11:34 pm
WTFO - May 9, 2009, 11:29 pm
of a "land of Allah" and gives them time to rebuild for the next attack. As a side, I think the irresponsible spending of Reps from 2000-2006 cost them dearly in the elections as well. However, the 2006-2008 Congress spent even more under Dems.
WTFO - May 9, 2009, 11:27 pm
kept us safe for 7+ years and against the war, that it dramatically impacted the elections. We now have a majority of politicians who have openly shown the willingness to withdraw from the war. That allows the enemy to claim victory by driving out US out
WTFO - May 9, 2009, 11:26 pm
that can be gained and it is counter to the "everything Bush does is evil" philosophy of the conservative haters. I say the enemy has won the publicity battle since they effectively turned (with liberal help) public opinion so far against a POTUS that
WTFO - May 9, 2009, 11:25 pm
enemy to win the battle in the public eye. On the ground we're kicking ass and doing great efforts in winning hearts/minds by building schools, soccer fields, parks, hospitals, etc. You don't get to hear about the successes because there are no ratings
WTFO - May 9, 2009, 11:23 pm
Very complimentary from someone who hates me, Robert. After being overseas in support of the war. I believe that the main problem with the Iraq war is the publicity aspect of the war. The far-lefties and their supportive media outlets have enabled the
Robert - May 7, 2009, 2:20 pm
I agree with WTFO's last 3 posts, and say to anyone who doesn't support the military to eat shit and die, also the problem with the Iraq war was the strategies they used not the war itself, if we won you would all cheer instead of whine.
WTFO - April 10, 2009, 1:17 am
forces from carrying out the types of operations that would have won the war. All the while, protestors, the media, Hanoi Jane and John Kerry built hatred towards the military so my father could get spit at on his return.
WTFO - April 10, 2009, 1:15 am
enough to get a Pres who didn't handicap the military by limiting the targets in the North and allowing us to bring maximum force on the enemy to break their ability to wage war. Unfortunately, the govt was too scared of pissing off China and kept our
WTFO - April 10, 2009, 1:13 am
Kmer Rouge is part of the killing I'm talking about. The fact that we abandoned our allies in Vietnam directly caused the brutal deaths of those who stood with us. Our military strength would have kept the enemies a bay. All we had to do was stay long
Sean - April 10, 2009, 12:50 am
I'd heard that the Kmer Rouge killed 2 million people in Campuchia -- are you referring to a different 2 million? And if so, how could the Americans have prevented the other slaughter?
WTFO - April 10, 2009, 12:41 am
The dumbass (barockeva) forgot to mention that after the whining liberal media, Congressmen, and potheads successfully got the troops pulled from Veitnam that 2 million people were slaughtered there. Do you want to take credit for that too, dipshit?
Mark - April 7, 2009, 6:55 pm
Now I'm beginning to understand barockeva a little better. You get your information from "South Park." At least now it's clear what your source is. You might want to try The Family Guy for insight to world history and The Simpson's for economic strategy.
LogicDude - April 7, 2009, 12:43 pm
And all the while the war went on, it was Liberal hand-wringers in Congress and the press that bad-mouthed the troops.
Airman - April 7, 2009, 12:29 pm
Vietnam.. started by JFK, a liberal, escalated by LBJ, a liberal, and ended by Nixon..NOT a liberal.. I still loved it that he bombed them on christmas day..
barockeva - April 7, 2009, 12:27 pm
It was liberal pussies that got the government to quit throwing good troops at the waste that was the Vietnam war.
barockeva - April 7, 2009, 12:26 pm
You people need to watch more south park. If it wasn't for the liberals, the conservatives would have pushed countries like China too far and would have been nuked into the ground.
WTFO - March 16, 2009, 12:52 am
men and women who are risking it all for our freedom and the freedom of others. Respectful dissent and disagreement with war is never a problem for me.
WTFO - March 16, 2009, 12:51 am
To clarify the poster for Timmy-Bob, it targets the anti-war liberals who state we've lost the war, or are murdering innocent Iraqis, or that that the war is over oil. Basically, I'm against dumbasses who state ignorant positions that demoralize military
Mark - March 15, 2009, 3:43 pm
Thanks EGD but I must now turn my attention elsewhere. I smell a Timmy in the vicinity and must prepare for the witticism of an unencumbered mind.
Elder God Douchebag loves to hear himself type. - March 15, 2009, 3:41 pm
Of course now there's no way of knowing if he'd stick to his one-term promise or not, but I'd certainly hope he'd have run for re-election. Figure if you're going for President, you might as well be in it for the whole thing.
Elder God Douchebag - March 15, 2009, 3:39 pm
You know what I mean, though. Time does age everyone, but being President tends to make one age horribly. Also, I brought the soapbox back.
Mark - March 15, 2009, 3:18 pm
Hey! Bring that soapbox back here! You win...McCain is old. Although he said he was only going to run for one term, I think if the situation (at the time) warranted it he would have stayed. Time ages everyone. What did you look like 4 or 8 years ago?
Elder God Douchebag will shut up in just a second. - March 15, 2009, 2:34 pm
That, and he said he'd only run one term, which says to me that he knows he wouldn't be able to handle said inherent stress. I'll get off the soapbox now.
Elder God Douchebag - March 15, 2009, 2:33 pm
Reason I said that was this. Look how being President ages people. Not real well, right? Hell, Bush looked semi-decent when he went in, looked old as hell coming out. Something tells me McCain couldn't have handled the stress inherent in the job.
Mark - March 15, 2009, 1:27 pm
McCain was able to get it up when it counted...in 1967. And then he kept it up for 5 and a half years. As for BHO or anyone saying he wouldn't last one term, maybe they should tell that to John McCain's mother.
Elder God Douchebag - March 15, 2009, 1:18 pm
I thought he attacked McCain on the basis that he was old and wouldn't last the one term he said he'd run...Wait, that's what I attacked him for...McCain can't get it up anymore.
Toussaint - March 15, 2009, 11:48 am
Now I hear BHO is planning on taxing employee health benefits to pay for his stimulus package-debt. And to think, during the campaign, he attacked J.M. for the very same thing he's planning on doing now.
Mark - March 15, 2009, 11:19 am
Bob - I see you've been a busy boy this morning spreading your liberal commie view point. Go right ahead, it's a free country for the time being. Enjoy it while you can.
Bob - March 15, 2009, 9:09 am
I just love the fact that Republicans think people are Un-Patriotic Saddam-loving Commies if they don't believe what the hell they say and follow what they believe. Fucking Morons, the lot of them.
Sean - February 7, 2009, 9:32 pm
See what blowin' yer defence budget on the war in Iraq got ya -- yer air force is practically flyin' crop-dusters now. Though I do applaud the retro uni's -- VERY shiek.


TAGS: www www
Rating: 5/5

More motifakes by WTFO

WTFO - July 14, 2013, 2:16 am
Thank you, from another crotchety old cynic.
WTFO - July 14, 2013, 2:15 am
I was on this site long before I was on the other. Sometimes I come across a funny that belongs here (I just hope I don't keep repeating other posters on accident) Thanks for the kudos.
Bolverk3778 - July 13, 2013, 4:50 pm
The Zealots above are the recruiters who send children to do what they are afraid to do themselves as they are to 'valuable' to the cause.
thecrotchetyoldcynic - July 12, 2013, 2:11 pm
Bravo! Bra-****ing-vo! 5L WTFO.
MissPriss - July 12, 2013, 11:11 am
So WTFO what brings ya 'round these here neck of the woods...besides a 5L poster.
WTFO - July 12, 2013, 12:30 am
Sure thing.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 11, 2013, 8:17 am
Hello my old Frenemy.....Post this one at religifake if you could.

In America -

islam is peace -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More motifakes by Reality Lord

Greybeard - August 22, 2014, 12:19 am
Extremely powerfull.