Motifake
politics
epic fail
military funny
stupid human
ufo
MAD
motifake

Comment on this Motifake


The Bible

Creator: Briton of Rose












 Comment using Facebook




bOB Chin - March 3, 2009, 10:03 am,
This is prob about as good a recap of the Bible as could be expected, from someone who only had a third grade Sunday school education to reference. There is no "gist" to the Bible, it's a compilation, like the Readers Digest of Religion. Read it or don't
Auron - March 17, 2009, 6:53 pm,
Did you honestly just compare The Bible to Reader's Digest? I lol, hard.
Agent K - May 31, 2009, 11:33 am,
more like cliff notes with lots of netspeak
GrofVuil - August 31, 2009, 4:21 pm,
hahaahahahahahaha true. bible is full of radical shit. Luckily mass mediums are killing biblical lies with their scientific proofs. I bet that if the human race survives 200 years, we laugh about your primitive religion.
LURCH - September 24, 2009, 1:33 am,
Funny though that for all your "science" you cannot explain the impetus for spontaneous generation of complex organisms. Atheist fail..
Zed - September 24, 2009, 1:35 am,
Yes, it does, it is called "Natural Selection". Creationist FAIL.
WTFO2 - September 24, 2009, 1:48 am,
Zed, natural selection does not answer the question of "spontaneous generation of complex organisms". It only describes how one species continues beyond others. Who fails is those who claim they 'know' an answer that no one can prove (on either side).
LURCH - September 24, 2009, 1:51 am,
Thank you WTFO. The unexplainable part of creation is why people refuse to accept that it is possible at all, and then make up theory without grounds and call it fact
Zed - September 24, 2009, 1:54 am,
Actually, it dos. What it doesn't explain is how life began in the first lace (Abiogenesis)or how the universe began (Cosmogenesis). Although I do, however, agree with you on your last point/sentence.
Zed - September 24, 2009, 1:55 am,
Sorry, "does", not dos. *facepalm*
WTFO2 - September 24, 2009, 2:03 am,
Like most issues, the answer most likely isn't at one of the extreme ends of the discussion but somewhere in the middle. I don't see why a theory of Creationism that utilized evolution is so hard for both sides to admit is possible.
Zed - September 24, 2009, 2:07 am,
However, then it falls to the question of "Which God did it?", which is where both the Atheists and the various Theists start catfighting. I myself have no problem with the concept of one (or more) deities to kick off the big bang and life (later on).
LURCH - September 24, 2009, 2:20 am,
I am not opposed to theories being presented as theory.. just give us all the plausible and widely accepted theories, but "science" has blinded people to the fact that Evolution is still unproven and unsupported in evidence...straight theory
Zed - September 24, 2009, 2:22 am,
*sigh* science fail. A Theory is a hypothesis that HAS been tested *AND STILL HOLDS UP*, in this case by both the fossil record and direct observation. Not only are you confusing the two terms, you're showing that you needed to pay more attention in class
LURCH - September 24, 2009, 2:35 am,
But theory is not conclusive by nature, they are still open to correction or disproof, like that whole fruit flies from meat thingy..was drinking in my college days
Zed - September 24, 2009, 2:38 am,
Yes, they are open to correction and/or disproof, but the point is it still holds up (and IS supported by evidence and direct observation, to the contrary of your previous post.)
Zed - September 24, 2009, 2:39 am,
In science, there is no such thing as a "scientific law", even Gravity has be a constant, thus partially disproving Newtons gravitational theory AND Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity.
Zed - September 24, 2009, 2:40 am,
Sorry, "been proven NOT to be a constant" is what I meant to type
Zed - September 24, 2009, 2:45 am,
meanwhile we have transitional forms coming out the wazoo in the geological/fossil record, and direct observation of evolution in natre in the here-and-now.
Zed - September 24, 2009, 2:53 am,
It's been nice debating with you, but it's 2 AM and I need to sleep. 'night!
LURCH - September 24, 2009, 3:04 am,
WOW central time zone here too. but i am at work so it is ok. night...God bless
aesop's folly - November 14, 2009, 2:07 pm,
very nice find
Start new comment thread
Register in seconds...
or
Log In